Tokenomics

We performed an audit which revealed the difference between a fairly standard approach to unlocking tokens and an optimized one, injecting a team with confidence in the lead-up to their TGE.

The thought of forking over $300,000 to an exchange is pretty daunting. Giving up $300 thousand of your own liquidity in a single day due to an error in the pool is disheartening and scary. In a world of decentralized exchanges, there are no introductory fees, but there is a tax imposed for naivete. And many projects find themselves having to pay it, not upon debuting, but when their schedule turns into a “stairway to hell”. Here is how to avoid falling into that trap and ensure your DEX serves as a springboard, not a financial meat grinder.

In 2025, celebrities launched personal tokens accompanied by massive hype campaigns. In practice, these coins have enriched the creators but soon collapsed when the illusion of their promised utility faded. Investors are now keen that celebrity personal coins are set up to fail. Especially following the broader November 2026 crypto crash, unlike more sustainable expert-created tokens.

A token doesn’t drop after TGE only because the product is weak, the marketing failed, or the listing went badly. In many cases, the sell pressure was built long before launch, through early token rounds. When too many cheap allocations reach the market at once, TGE doesn’t create the problem. It exposes it.

Most tokenomics mistakes happen before launch, while the team still has time to fix them. The problem is rarely one wrong formula. It’s the lack of a system: the token should be part of the business model, not a separate asset attached to the product at the last minute.

A token loses value when it stops being part of the product and becomes nothing more than something to trade. A tokenomics audit identifies that gap: it shows why users need the token, how it creates demand, how it behaves on the market, and which mechanics prevent it from working as a real asset.